Shouldn’t the question really be what’s the difference between a “Trail Journal” and a regular blog?.. because there should be a distinction.
Trailjournals.com should be (I’m assuming) somewhat connected to those of us suffering from trail fever - whether we’re wanting to hike, planning a hike, doing a hike, remembering a hike, etc. The actual content of a Trailjournal isn’t so much the issue as the assumption that it is coming from the hiking experience, regardless of the tangent(s) and the musings or even the mileage.
The blogs seem to creep in (and “crowd the trail”) when the hiker has abandoned the trail for whatever reason and decided to use the Trailjournals site for keeping their friends and family and fans updated… partly & probably because it’s just easier to stay with what you started.
Obviously post hike discussions and reflections are as valid as the pre & mid-journey ones. Unfortunately, it gets a little confusing to tune into an individual’s journal (Example: Wag Daddy - PCT - 2006) and see the non-stop daily score of meals, movies, sleep, etc. with hardly a mention of a trail. (Though, in Wag Daddy’s case, now that he is off the PCT for good he is professing to be on a “spiritual hike” of some sort.)
So-hey: All that be said, it should just boil down to common sense and courtesy, right? “Hike your own hike” morphs into “Journal your own journal” quite easily… If we are on this site then we are either hiking or we are self-abusing trail addicts who enjoy the vicarious living through others that Trailjournals provides. I’m not ashamed to enjoy other folks walking when I cannot. When they stop walking, though, I usually stop reading.
Sincerely, Gravy
gravy