Thinking back to the trail, I can vividly remember two distinctions between hikers:
1.) Purists vs. Blue Blazers (or yellow blazers, etc.)
2.) Hikers that looked like they would finish vs. hikers that looked like they wouldn’t finish.
I found some distinguishing characteristics of each side of the above cases.
Purists seemed to be those who had lighter gear, hiked more miles per day, were focused on finishing (mainly their reason for hiking was mainly to finish the trail), and didn’t spend too much time in towns.
Blue Blazers seemed to be those who had heavier gear, hiked less miles per day, weren’t focused on finishing (more so on being out in the woods), and spent on average, more time in towns.
Hikers that looked like they would finish were those that seemed more fit, had more top-of-the-line gear, had previous hiking experience, and had an optimistic attitude about the trail on a day-to-day basis (weren’t down when it was raining, the miles didn’t get to them as much, etc.).
Hikers that looked like they wouldn’t finish were those that seemed less fit, carried more gear that they wanted as opposed to needed, had less hiking experience, and were pessimistic more often than not.
(Allthough, some of these characteristics didn’t always fit)
Now, I raise this characteristics of the above types of hikers in order to pose you a question. Did you experience these different types of hikers? If so, do you agree with my observations? Did you notice any other characteristics that I failed to mention? What were you experiences like with the different type of thru-hikers? And finally what type of hiker did you consider yourself?
Lion Cub, '03