Hi Jeff. Great question! I brought my dog in '05 and had my wife come get her from Breck. Also I have read a few journals and had a few friends who brought their dogs on the trails. More often than not the dogs end up going home injured and in one case, not at all. You have the choice to hike–the dog doesn’t. I agree it is nice to have your best friend along for the hike, but they lack the ability to tell you when something is wrong, be it an injured leg, worn pad on their foot, stickers, ticks, etc. Even the largest of dogs is going to be a magnet for attention from certain apex predators on the trail and may interfere with other wildlife (birds, squirrels, deer, etc…) I personally love dogs and I love to see them on the trail (especially labs) but the truth is, not all hikers share my sentiments. The debate on whether or not to bring ones dog on a long distance trail has gone on for years in many of the online communities. It is not unlike bringing a toddler on a long distance hike. They may have fun going out into the woods initially, but that is because they are with their “parent,” and they are just happy to be with them. But at the end of the day, you are not only going to have to make sure you are ok, you are also going to have to make sure your “kid” is ok, too. I love my dogs, but when I hike they take away from the experience, and the truth is, they don’t have the choice to go. I was basically forcing her (my dog) to be out there and walk miles and miles. She was never the same after that hundred miles. We did it in 9 days. She hurt when she walked up until the day I had to put her down in 2011. And to clarify, She was a Lab–NAFC. Extremely athletic and under voice command only. 5 years old at the time of the hike. If I could go back, I would have left her at home.
Liam