One of the differences I’ve noticed between Eastern and Western hikers is the way they refer to their pack weights. This is a pretty silly issue, but I’m looking for help understanding it.
I hiked the AT last summer after doing a lot of hiking out west, where I live. I’ve hiked the PCT and CDT. It seemed to me that all pack weight discussions out west use pack “base weight” (no food or water) as the normal standard. So if someone talked about a 12 pound pack, you just knew he or she meant base weight.
But on the AT, it seemed that most hikers I met talked about pack weight with “a full load of food and water”. And that seems to continue in forum discussions, too. My question is, what exactly is a “full load”?
I remember a frustrating conversation when someone I met on the AT asked me how much my pack weighed. When I replied with a very low number, he said, “No, I meant with food and water.” So I asked, “OK, how much food and how much water, and I’ll do the math.” He just couldn’t answer me, for some reason. We couldn’t communicate over this very simple issue, and I still can’t understand why. This happened often enough to make me wonder about it.
Any insights? Anyone care?
PS: By the way, One other difference I noticed was Easterners rely less on raingear and clothing. It didn’t seem to matter so much if you got wet on the AT. I’m pretty sure I spent more time trying to keep dry than most hikers I met on the AT. Now that I’m back home, I wonder why my friends put on their rain shells for every little shower.
Garlic