Dear billy:
First issue: Whether guns are allowed on the trail by law or not. That’s probably a state by state issue, and occasionally a federal issue, depending on whose land the trail runs over. I don’t know whether guns are allowed on the trail legally or not.
Second issue: Whether the hiker is in fear of something or not. Its absolutely clear that some are in considerable fear, and that’s the basis of their desire to have a gun while hiking. Other’s simply don’t have the fear and so have no perceived need for a gun.
Personal anecdote: While hiking the AT one time I met another hiker. As we became friendly, he told me how he’d started off carrying a 44 magnum with him. Ultimately, he said, he got rid of it because it was “too damn heavy” and he’d come to realize that carrying the weapon simply wasn’t necessary once he’d had some time to properly perceive and adjust to the forest environment. As we spoke, it became clear that it was his dissipation of fear that led him to get rid of his weapon. “It was what I saw outside the forest, all the dangers one experiences in society, that made me think I’d need one. All the whackos out there! But, here,” he said, “there’s just no need. It’s completely different here. The people are all friendly. And the animals? They’re no danger! They’re afraid of us! And besides, if they’re big, you just be careful around them, they don’t mean us any harm.” And that was that.
In time, if you’re actually on AT for any length of time, and I hope you do persevere, you’ll see that there’s really no need to carry a weapon. Your fears will dissipate in time, just as my fellow hiker’s did.
Sincerely–Conan.
Conan