I’m all for a pace that’s slow enough for you to enjoy the wonders of the trail. But for me, taking 10 or 12 months (or longer) would mean a decrease in enjoyment.
Part of the thru-hiking experience is HIKING. Putting one foot in front of the other and moving through the woods. Sure, some days it’s great to sit on the ridge for hours on end, but if you want to do that every day, why bother calling it a thru-hike? Why not just hit the beautiful views in all of America’s state & national parks & forests, without trying to do GA>ME?
And what about the natural urge to compete? Okay, the trail isn’t about speed or beating others. But don’t you ever feel the need to push yourself? Just like it’s nice to take the occasional zero day, it’s also exhilarating to try a 25- or 35-mile day. I’d never want to do the AT in sub-4 months, but I’m a fan of the Maryland Challenge. You’re competing against the clock, trying to push yourself to a new achievement.
And finally, almost every hiker has the big concern: moola. For me, a six-month thru-hike required me to save for over two years. Stretching the hike to a year or more would mean I’d have to plan ahead by five-plus years.
Just my two cents. HYOH.
Bachelor