what is this thing about having to have a trail name even before one puts the pack on??? i understand when somebody hangs on to a formerly GIVEN trailname for another trip(i have), but people just wracking their brains for a “fitting” name while planning a (first?)trip for 200? seems to give it all a new/different meaning. it is not shameful NOT to have a trailname, and - yes - it should be given naturally and by somebody else than the bearer…or am i getting all wrong?
jules