Yep, I guess I may be one of those speed demon hikers this thread is referring to. Good points all around. But I caution against the mentality of “slower is necessarily superior.”
I can’t agree more with the smell the roses approach go-slow, etc… But did I practice what I preach? Well, some may think 4 months 22 days is fast, and it is compared to 7+ months. And I am happy for those whose schedule allows them that amount of time.
However, some hikers have time and budget constraints that unfortunately encourage them to hike faster, as I noticed with many northbounders on my Long Trail thru-hike this July as well as my 2001 AT hike. I thought I’d be one of them starting with only 6 months till school resumed in August. But then, I finished 1.5 months ahead of that schedule, so deadlines were not the reason i pushed mo’ miles.
So what was the reason? Well one was the great hiking community that was mentioned as a reason to slow down. Believe it or not, I met some great people out on the trail leaving as early as I did. And I grew to like hiking with some of them, so I adjusted my pace to hike with these individuals; and this is one of the main reasons for pace adjustments for many many hikers fast or slow. It just so happened that some of the hikers I wanted to hang with had to hike faster because of deadlines- and so it goes.
But ultimately, I had a choice whether to hike fast or slow. And I freely chose “fast.” So did I sacrifice the enjoyment, freedom, and beauty of it all that pro-go-slowers speak of? To answer that question, we must first reacknowledge the fact that the AT experience is highly personal.
I enjoyed pushing my body from time to time. I personally enjoyed how I felt after a 30 mile day when I took full advantage of day light hours and knew I acheived my goal; and I cherished the nirvana that is the natural phenomena runners call “runners’ highs.” I loved gliding for hours over the rolling country-side without a care in the world as I pushed my physical boundaries, free to choose in the end where I would stop for the night.
I too felt freedom in knowing I was hiking my hike and enjoying it, I enjoyed the luxury of 1.5 month original safety cushion (and in finishing in June, I always knew I had over half the hiking season to get to Katahdin before winter prohibited a 2001 completion). That made me feel a rare freedom in this day and age as there were NEVER any pressing social OR “natural” deadlines.
As for the beauty, I cherished the rare solitude I experienced being ahead of the crowds. I sat for hours in amazement at the profound and refreshing absolute silence of a white winter evening in a southern shelter. Many nights were spent alone, and many were spent in the company of other early-bird hikers who formed a small, tight entourage. The winter and early spring landscapes were a sight to behold!
Of course I’m biased! But let me tell you, brothers and sisters, that I would not want to change ANYTHING about my 2001 AT journey. I enjoyed myself, I had fun, I experienced the wonder of winter, the beauty of spring, the joy of making new friends, the incredible silence and solitude. And oh yeah, as Hungry Howie puts it: “The freedom of walking.” If I can do that hiking “fast” (never “racing” mind you), then my 4 m. 22 d. hike was a great success and maybe we should reconsider being so judgemental of other hiking stylees. After all, ya don’t know fo’ sure until ya walk 2,160 miles in the other person’s shoes.
Sweeper